Tehran is ready to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.
The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed new appeals had come from intermediaries to reopen talks with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.
Araghchi is walking a challenging path since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.
He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.
The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.
Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.
It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".
Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in some form if discussions reopen.
Trump last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.
In his address to the conference, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He said the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a truce.
Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith difficult to reestablish.
Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently tried to impose their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the final answer to address disagreements, but its standards, regulations and principles must be adhered to."
"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a answer in the identical approach."
In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned many lessons from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."
He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this assault."